My AT&T U-verse Experience in Knoxville

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

I’ve had quite a few people ask about my recent AT&T U-verse install, so I thought a quick blog post was in order. Keep in mind, my install happened during the first week of the Knoxville, TN U-verse rollout – so I’m sure things will go faster (as far as the installation goes) as they do more and more installs in this area.

I chose to go with U-verse because I live in an older neighborhood in Knoxville and my high speed internet choices are fairly limited. I’ve had 3Mbps DSL from AT&T for the last 3 years and it’s been decent, but I really needed more upload speed. I’m a software developer so I usually have lots of large software updates I need to download quite often and I frequently have fairly large chunks of data I need to upload to a server on a regular basis (Dropbox, Subversion, etc.). I ended up going with AT&T U-verse since they offer a package with 18Mbps download and 2Mbps upload…this was my main consideration for choosing U-verse, not the VoIP service nor the TV service. I want to make it clear that I didn’t compare the TV and phone services to other providers…so if that is your main focus, this writeup may not be useful to you.

Speed Test – Before & After
All tests were performed with www.speedtest.net on a MacBook running Snow Leopard connected to my wireless LAN – this is my most common usage scenario, so it’s what I decided to test with.  Also, ignore the “distance” in these speed tests…all were performed in Knoxville at the same location.

Before U-verse - Speed Test - Morristown, TN

Before U-verse - Speed Test - Morristown, TN

After U-verse - Speed Test - Morristown, TN

After U-verse - Speed Test - Morristown, TN

From this quick test, you can see my download rate is much higher, but my upload rate also got a massive improvement.  The ping time got cut in half as well – so it’s a win-win-win with the U-verse upgrade.  The thing is, the download rate isn’t anywhere near the max rate of 18Mbps, so I decided to try a speed test against the Atlanta, GA data center since I would assume they have more capacity than Morristown…

U-verse - Speed Test - Atlanta, GA

U-verse - Speed Test - Atlanta, GA

Nice huh?  That’s quite close to the max download rate and a very respectable upload speed…and the ping is lower still.  So the bottom line is U-verse blows regular DSL out of the water and it is generally better than cable or at least very comparable.  One of the things I don’t like about cable internet is they use different methods to boost your speeds for short periods of time.  So you may have a 12Mbps package and for 30 secs – 2 minutes, you may get that speed when starting a download, but if you’re downloading something large, you will usually notice your download speed dialing back pretty drastically…whereas I should (in theory) have these U-verse speeds throughout the whole download.  Realistically though, you’re going to be very unlikely to find a single server that can provide you with a download at these rates, so the only way you would be able to get this much data flowing would be to have quite a few downloads going on simultaneously.

The Installation

Now that the speed test is out of the way, you may want to know about the installation process.  When I signed up for the install, I was told the install takes between 4 to 6 hours depending on the services I wanted installed and the specifics of my house/neighborhood.  The U-verse install requires two different groups – one is an external group that hooks up your new equipment on the outside of your house and the other group does everything inside the house.  In my case, I heard from both groups at 9am – both called to confirm the appointment and to let me know they were on the way.  The external guy got here around 9:30am and he started checking the lines outside my house.  The internal guys got here around 9:45am and I gave them a quick tour of the places I wanted U-verse.  The external guy worked until 11 or a little after getting everything prepped and getting some electronics added on to my house that connect back up to the utility pole.  While he was doing that, the internal guys explored the attic and crawlspace to determine the best way to run my new wires.

I have an older house and even though I did have coax cables in most of the rooms, the cables were always on the opposite wall from my TVs (I have not had cable for over 3 years…so placement in relation to the cables wasn’t exactly important prior to today).  After talking to the U-verse guys about this, they agreed they should go ahead and run new wires to all of my TVs…but here’s the awesome part: they ran Cat 5e cables to all my rooms *for free* instead of coax!  That was a HUGE win for me…why?  Because now I can add a network switch in any room with one of the new network jacks and I’ve got a way to hardwire in my other goodies…specifically, my Xbox 360 and my Blu-ray players.  If you already had coax cable that was close to your TVs, I don’t think they would run anything for you since they prefer to use existing wiring.  Even if they do run new stuff for your install, *you* must ask for Cat 5e instead of coax if that is what you want.  They can install either one usually unless there are specific environmental conditions at your location – in which case they may not give you a choice.  Anyway, it took them maybe an hour to hour and a half to run the network drops (I had four sets total in my case…all from the crawlspace).

By this time, the outside stuff was done and tested.  Both teams must test the line once it’s ready to go – until that point, you don’t really know whether you can actually get U-verse service or not.  If you can’t, I don’t know what happens…in my case, both teams agreed that I had an excellent signal here so we could proceed with installation of the Residential Gateway (the “RG”).  So, they finished up all of the network jacks (adding faceplates, etc.) and then connected up the RG and the backup battery (a small Belkin UPS…keeps the net and VoIP up for 4 hours if the power goes out).  The RG essentially *IS* the U-verse service…it controls everything.  It has a router (wired and wireless…b/g only), the VoIP system, and the TV connections.  So if this box isn’t happy, nothing is going to work.  It’s important to note that this RG box needs a true, three prong grounded electrical outlet…I have a 50 year old home, but luckily a handful of my outlets were updated to be grounded just before I bought this house.  If you’re thinking about U-verse and you have an older house, make sure you have one of these outlets or you won’t be able to install…you can’t use an adapter for this part, you *must* have a real grounded outlet near the RG.

As luck would have it, my RG was not happy.  No matter what they did, it just wouldn’t connect to the network.  The techs tried everything they could think of, but after about 2 hours of troubleshooting it, they decided it we should try another RG.  At this point, the installation was crossing the 7 hour mark (the guys didn’t even take a lunch break…).  This time, the RG connected properly.  Even when the RG works, the initial setup still takes about 15 minutes while it configures itself.  Once that was done, I had to connect to the RG from my MacBook and finish a few last steps on the AT&T website.  Once all of that was out of the way, the techs connected up all of my TV boxes and let them sync.  All of them had to perform an automatic update that took another 10-15 minutes to complete.  Finally, we did a quick test of my phone system, finished porting my number to the new system, and then they gave me a quick tour of the U-verse software on the DVR.  It was 6:30pm and the installation was completed.

So, was it worth it?

I’ve had the service for less than a day as I write this, but I can say that this was 110% worth it for my purposes.  Heck, just getting these great upload and download rates makes it worth it for me, but getting my house wired with a wired gigabit network was an unbelievable bonus.  Will I watch all 450+ TV channels?  No, I’ll probably watch 20 or less any given week.  If you like TV though, this package has as much as any of them.  I don’t use the landline phone much, so I’m not sure how useful the VoIP upgrade will be…call quality sounds much better (I had some noise prior to this upgrade), but I wanted to keep my Knoxville number, so I kept the phone service for the moment.  I think a typical install in a newer home that already had existing coax (or ethernet) cable in all the right places would be much, much shorter than my install…maybe 2-4 hours.  So if you’re thinking about getting U-verse, don’t let the length of my install deter you – it’s very unlikely it’ll take longer than 6 hours max.  All of the guys I dealt with during the install were a pleasure to work with – other than the technical issues with the bad RG hardware, everything went as smoothly as one would want.  The real question is the long term support – will AT&T keep up the great customer service I experienced or will they drop the ball now that I’m committed to U-verse?  Only time will tell, but I can certainly recommend U-verse at this point.

UPDATE (10/30/2009): It’s been a couple of days now and I’m still very happy with the service.  The only “issue” I’ve found is that I misunderstood the stream limit with U-verse as far as TV programming.  I thought all boxes would be able to watch any channel (HD or SD) and the DVR box could do 4 channels (all recording or watching 1 and recording 3).  What I didn’t realize was that your entire U-verse system can only support 4 channels simultaneously and of those 4, only 2 can be HD.  So if you have three boxes like I do, you can’t watch live HD content on all three boxes at the same time unless you’re watching the same show(s) on two or more of the boxes.  If you have lots of TVs in your house, you may hit this issue pretty quickly.  In my case, I hit the issue because three of the shows I like to watch come on at the same time on the same day of the week…when I tried to set the DVR to record all of them in HD, it told me I couldn’t.  I can drop one of the shows down to SD and it’s fine, but while the recording is going on, I won’t be able to watch any other channels in HD (it gives you a blue screen and tells you no more HD channels can be used until the recording has stopped).  For me, this isn’t a deal breaker, but I thought I should put a note on here since this limit wasn’t clear to me…I knew the limit of 4 streams on the DVR box, I just didn’t realize that was a limit on the whole U-verse install.

Top 5 Favorite Apps (for Mac)

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

I’ve been using the mac for just right around 5 months now. In that time, I’ve found that there are a handful of applications I use very regularly, so I thought I would share in case any other switchers are looking for apps to check out. Here are my current top 5 (in no particular order):

Other Noteworthy Apps

iPhone Apps

Sunday, July 13th, 2008

Well, about three months ago, I applied for the Apple iPhone Developer Program so I could build a few apps for my iPhone.  Last Friday, I was finally approved.  I’m not sure why it took so long for Apple to open things up, but I’m glad they finally released the finished SDK and let everyone in.  I’m sure in the next couple of months, there will be some awesome applications out there.  I’ve been working most of the weekend on my first app, but I’ll talk more about that later.

I did notice that one of the top 10 apps (#9 currently) is “iBeer” – it uses the iPhone’s accelerometer to display “beer” on the iPhone’s screen that looks as if it were in a glass when you tip the iPhone up to your mouth.  I think it’s an interesting use of the hardware and all, but I can’t believe it’s a top 10 non-free app.  I mean, this thing costs $3 + tax…  Just amazing what people value these days (but congratz to the developer for coming up with that – paying off big time I’m sure). 

Ok, so I lied – Back to Mac & WinXP

Tuesday, June 17th, 2008

Yesterday, I posted about how I was giving up OS X after 3 months of use.  Well, after 24 hours of use, I remembered why I tried to switch to mac to start with…activation.  I’m one of those people that likes to reformat a machine when it’s getting too much crud – after all, as a software developer, I try out new things when they come out and that’s not really a good thing for the system if you want to keep it clean and fast.  The problem, is that I don’t really want to tie Vista to my MacBook since I may want to go back to OS X at some point…  I remembered I had my dual core Athlon 64 desktop w/ triple monitors just sitting in a closet, so found some desk space and fired it up.  It’s so much easier to get my .NET development on using my desktop.  I’m sure it’s just habit, but it just doesn’t feel right on the laptop (and I miss my third screen).

So, now my MacBook is transitioning back to OS X Leopard (looking forward to Snow Leopard though if they really do speed things up), but my main workhorse is my trusty old desktop.  I really hate not using Vista since I purchased it at retail, but XP just feels better (and Vista doesn’t like my desktop…but XP flies on it thanks to the ton o’ RAM and 10K RPM SATA drive).

I’m really surprised that I didn’t like having a dedicated Vista laptop, but it just didn’t feel right once everything was said and done.  With this new setup, things seem just right…old habits die hard.

Thoughts on iPhone 2.0

Sunday, June 15th, 2008

I’ve been thinking about whether it will be worth it to pick up an iPhone 2.0 on July 11th.  I’ve had the original iPhone for a while now (I picked it up when they discontinued the 4GB version) and I have mixed feelings about it.  iPhone 1.0 is certainly the best PDA type phone I’ve ever used.  Everything is very well designed, the battery life is good, sound quality is at least as good as other phones I’ve had, the web browser is fantastic (unless you need to view Flash content), and it’s a great iPod.

So why am I not already getting in line for 2.0?  Well, the first thing is that the 2.0 software will run on the 1.0 hardware.  So any bug fixes, new core application updates (e.g. scientific calculator), and other improvements will work just fine on my original phone.  The only real hardware features that matter for version 2.0 of the hardware are 3G network chip and the A-GPS hardware. 

 

2G is certainly not setting any speed records – but for the most part, it gets the job done fine for me.  I use the web more on the iPhone than I have on any other phone, but it’s still nothing at all compared to my web use on a real PC – so 3G would be nice, but it’s nothing I can’t live without.  The main issue with the 3G support is that my phone bill will go up by $10 per month for 2 years – so $240 total increase on top of buying the $200/$300 iPhone 2.0.  It’s not a horrible price increase, but in my particular situation, it’s harder to justify the benefit outweighing the cost there. 

 

The A-GPS is a bit more appealing though.  I have a handheld GPS unit from Garmin, but it’s meant for hiking/geocaching type activities and not for navigation.  I do like the idea of buying a cheap dash mount and then my iPhone could be a very decent auto navigation system that moves around to different cars easily.  Of course, this all depends on what GPS software is released for the phone, but I’m sure we’ll see great things in this area.  The other thing is that we really haven’t had a small GPS device that had an always on broadband-link internet link – that could allow for all kinds of interesting situations that make the GPS ability of the iPhone unlike anything we’ve seen (for better or for worse).

 

At this point, my feeling is that I’m going to hold off for a bit and see what applications come out that make use of iPhone 2.0 hardware features.  If they are compelling enough, then I may make the jump, but I’m starting to get to that point where I need to see real world benefits from new gadgets instead of just the conceptual greatness of them…  Even on July 11th, the really amazing applications for iPhone may not even be ready because of the way Apple has chosen to limit the developer program – from the latest Apple keynote, it sounds like some developers (and some SDK functionality) won’t even be ready until September anyway.  We’ll see how things play out, but for now, I think I’ll be keeping my $440.